| « | Liberalism, Conservatism, and Families |
»
|
|
Saturday, December 13, 2008
The Death Cults
Everyone “knows” what a death cult is, but few persons are able to recognize one when they confront its members, or its manifestations, in plain sight. Here are some thoughts on the subject, with reference to some of our time’s most visible anti-life trends:
- A Little Death
- The Convergence Of The Death Cults
- The Advance Of The Death Cults
- The Convergence Continues
- The Convergence Is Complete
- The Embryo Of The Death Cults
Comments
and“JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population.”
“UK population must be cut to 30m.”
When a Western government no longer hides its intentions to drastically reduce their population, will its subjects finally act to end the influence of misanthropes? Or, more ominously, is it a sign that the government believes (and maybe all its associate nations believe) that they are untouchable and “there is nothing that our moronic populace can do about it?”
We’ve been warning of these developments for years Fran. I fear nobody believed then—and there are surely many who will remain in denial—that the intelligentsia ever really meant to implement such draconian measures. Even the few conservative speakers who have addressed the threat (Coulter and Steyn to name two) do so regularly.
As you know, it has been my long held opinion that this is why the Judeo-Christian ethic has been under attack for so long, and under renewed and concentrated attack in only the last few years. God specifically said we are not to sacrifice innocents when men think that they have no other choice; that we should have faith that he would provide.
Sad to say, too many of the enemy inhabit the religious institutions—something you have recently pointed out on a less drastic scale.
When most all of our leaders are out to kill large numbers of us (witness the silence coming from current leaders in denouncing news and programs like this), it sure seems to be our holy duty, in the least, to seek out new leaders.
If nothing else, this news item should tell us all that the need for self protection you have been writing of is by no means overblown.
Posted by Pascal (the derivative) on 03/24/2009 at 07:01 PMI only just noticed that your death cult series left out two others essays that back-filled the original with some important details that do not otherwise appear in the other “screeds.” They are 1.Are We Good For Us, and 2.Are We Good For Us, Part Two: The Ontology Of Coercive Population Control.
Just look at the question with which you ended the last of these.
if we could show an identity between the anti-natal movement and the other highest-profile causes championed by the Left: environmentalism, abortion on demand, no-growth economics, and rigorous government planning of cities and suburbs? [How about control of everything in the economy: Complete Statism?] Would the convergence of the death cults become perceptible to the ordinary, indifferently political American?
It strikes your Curmudgeon that there’s immense opportunity here.
I added the bracketed summary as well as the bold to your final wise assessment, now long forgotten. Your exposure of the Smiths and Joneses was never more important, IMHO.
Posted by Pascal (the derivative) on 03/25/2009 at 12:33 AMI’ve gotten unprecedented response to And So, What’s the Consequence of Being Deemed Unuseful? along with other comments on the web conveying a similar message.
I think it is because the Obana administration overestimated the safety of using phrases not heard publicly since the Third Reich. Obamacare prioritizes “saving socially useful” persons before other entities.
The likely outrage to the brazen uttering of such words may well force an abandonment of open disclosures such as this. While the words may disappear, it is clear that you know that the mindset will not.
Because of essays such as this series, you have added credibility in fighting against those who think they must play god.
God bless your fight.
Posted by Pascal (the derivative) on 07/10/2009 at 04:29 PMEven at this late date, this man of considerable courage and fortitude will only allow himself to publicly suggest what you and I have long admitted
That he fears that he will be thought of as a kook is what I hear from most when I remark upon this aversion. “Oh, even more than now?” I quip in response.“this ... faction that does not care how many children it kills ... wants as much of humanity (it sometimes seems to me) to be wiped off the face of the planet.”—see 13:30 of this video.
I think the reality is more to our point Fran.
Because Lord Monckton is prominent and has stature, he are more of a threat to the anti-human forces than you or I, so he has more to fear, far more than ever he does for his speaking up about the fraudulence of AGW.
But he’s clearly no coward. Men of his stature fear—rightly I believe—for those closest to them if they flat out stated the obvious instead of hedging with “it sometimes seems to me...”.
Fran: what more can we do so that leaders such as he no longer fear taking on the anti-human forces more directly?
Posted by Pascal (the derivative) on 10/21/2009 at 07:42 PMABC News: “Death Panels (snicker) Will Save Money”—Paul Krugman of the NYTimes
[There is a 36 second video that will not display in this format.]
Posted by Pascal (the derivative) on 03/30/2010 at 05:18 PM
