Navigation

image

Your Host
Curmudgeon Emeritus
Francis W. Porretto

Audio File Pages


Most recent entries (Blog)

Screeds

Essay Series

Otherwise Significant

Search

Weblog Categories

Monthly Archives

Calendar

July 2010
S M T W T F S
       1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Syndicate

« Turning The Barrel
»
Posted Comments    |     Comment Form

Friday, May 29, 2009

Great Oaks From Little Acorns Dept.

By The Curmudgeon Emeritus

The esteemed Charles Hill has picked up a comment of your Curmudgeon's from this post of a few days ago, and in so doing has sparked a delightful discussion about political term limits and related subjects.

Your Curmudgeon's favorite contribution so far is this one, from commenter Kirk:

Personally, I prefer a variation on the Groucho Marx line about refusing to join any club that would have him as a member; I sometimes think that the mere expression of desire for an elective office should be disqualifying.

Which caused your Curmudgeon to rev his mental engines. Not for the first time, of course -- the subject of political ambition and what usually accompanies it is never far from his thoughts -- but this time, something new bubbled to the surface.

If our public offices are to be filled by men who don’t want to be there, then we must conscript them. The Thirteenth Amendment would appear to forbid that. But the Amendment contains an escape clause:

“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

…so we could draft convicted felons to serve as our public officials! That would seem to slay two vultures with one stone:

  1. No elections, no campaigns, and no pandering;
  2. No more worries about governmental corruption: we’d know with perfect certainty that everyone in office is dishonest.

It would even be possible to improve on the technique by establishing, as a matter of law, that only certain categories and ages of felons are eligible for political conscription. Your Curmudgeon would suggest:

  1. One-time impulse killers for President;
  2. Armed burglars for Congress and the Senate;
  3. Bunco artists for the federal courts;

...with a lower age limit of 60 in all cases. More, these categories would be reserved to federal use. The states, counties and municipalities would have to make do with other kinds of slimeballs:

For the state governments:

  1. Extortionists for state governor;
  2. Forgers for the state legislatures;
  3. Stalkers for the state courts.

For county governments:

  1. Legbreakers for county executive;
  2. Pickpockets for the county legislatures;
  3. Three-card-monte hustlers for the county courts.

And last but certainly least, for municipalities:

  1. Slanderers and libelers for mayor or town supervisor;
  2. Numbers runners for city or town council;
  3. Spousal abusers for town and family courts.

There are approximately 500,000 elective offices in these United States, and about two million persons incarcerated for the crimes enumerated above, so there are at least as many candidates for the positions as would be required to fill them. At long last, we could solve the problem of political corruption, the problem of criminal recidivism, and the problem of finding useful employment for the ex-con! It’s a cancer cure. A veritable cancer cure!

Posted by The Curmudgeon Emeritus on 05/29/2009 at 08:09 AM

Print Vers.



Comments


Comment Form    |     Back to Top/Original Post
  1. I’m flattered by the Curmudgeon’s attentions, as a long-time reader of both this blog and Dustbury. And I love the 13th Amendment loophole!

    Posted by  on  05/29/2009  at  12:38 PM
  2. Involuntary servitude is still practiced in the form of jury duty and a military draft.  Either one is to be completed upon punishment of law. 

    Look I hate the concept, myself, but I think that the only way that this thing could possibly get fixed and set back on the track that it is supposed to be on is if we do the following:

    1.) Restrict the franchise to only those who have a direct, vested interest in the future health of this nation (ok, I actually like this idea.) That means producing members of society, that are here legally for a period no less than 5 years, that are not on the public dole for anything (ANYTHING) at all, who have, at a minimum, completed high school (GED), gainfully employed or recently laid off (no more than 1 year unemployement) or are a qualified stay at home parent, and possibly even must be a landowner, although that would disqualify a lot of urbanites who are qualified to vote. 

    2.) Turn to mass conscription of qualified individuals for public service to last no longer than two years.  This one sucks, it goes against every thing that i hold dear, but if we can legally draft 18 year olds to go die in war, we should be allowed to draft 60 year olds to go make competent, gray-hair type decisions for the good of this nation. 

    The problem that the very people who wish for the power and prestige of public office are the same people that we want to keep out of office can be solved in no other way that I can see.

    Posted by  on  05/29/2009  at  03:37 PM


Comment Form


Posted Comments    |     Back to Top/Original Post

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.



© Copyright 2001-2010 Francis W. Porretto. All rights reserved.

E-mails and comments become the property of Francis W. Porretto

Powered by ExpressionEngine

Member:

Affiliated Merchants

image
image
Click Image to Sample or Purchase as an E-Book.
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Blog Roll